vrijdag 11 december 2009

Over Ostrom

De nobelprijswinares op wikipedia:

Ostrom is considered one of the leading scholars in the study of common pool resources. In particular, Ostrom's work emphasizes how humans interact with ecosystems to maintain long-term sustainable resource yields. Common pool resources include many forests, fisheries, oil fields, grazing lands, and irrigation systems. She conducted her field studies on the management of pasture by locals in Africa and irrigation systems management in villages of western Nepal. Ostrom's work has considered how societies have developed diverse institutional arrangements for managing natural resources and avoiding ecosystem collapse in many cases, even though some arrangements have failed to prevent resource exhaustion. Her current work emphasizes the multifaceted nature of human–ecosystem interaction and argues against any singular "panacea" for individual social-ecological system problems.

Ostrom identifies eight "design principles" of stable local common pool resource management:

  1. Clearly defined boundaries (effective exclusion of external unentitled parties);
  2. Rules regarding the appropriation and provision of common resources are adapted to local conditions;
  3. Collective-choice arrangements allow most resource appropriators to participate in the decision-making process;
  4. Effective monitoring by monitors who are part of or accountable to the appropriators;
  5. There is a scale of graduated sanctions for resource appropriators who violate community rules;
  6. Mechanisms of conflict resolution are cheap and of easy access;
  7. The self-determination of the community is recognized by higher-level authorities;
  8. In the case of larger common-pool resources: organization in the form of
  9. multiple layers of nested enterprises, with small local CPRs at the base level.

In welke mate bevestigt dit enkele 'liberale' perspectieve op self-governance? En in welke mate ontkracht dit enkele (typische) verwijten van vrijwillige mechanismen?

Grappig dat haar eerste principe is: 'private eigendom [over de productiemiddelen]' in de relevante (en niet karikaturale) betekenis van het woord. Ben ik trouwens de enige die vindt dat dit evengoed kan gaan over een onderneming? (En dat, bijgevolg, moderne ondernemingen niet zoveel anders zijn dan de 'dorpsoplossingen' die zij bestudeerde?)

Dringend haar literatuur eens bestuderen; zoveel is duidelijk.

Geen opmerkingen: